Thimmarajamma vs Manjamma — 9/2020

Case under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section 151 of CPC. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Call On Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR610001932020

Filing Number

9/2020

Filing Date

08-Jan-2020

Registration No

9/2020

Registration Date

08-Jan-2020

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA

Judge

888-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section 151 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thimmarajamma

    Adv. Ananda M.T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manjamma

  2. 2.Manjanna

  3. 3.Prakash

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 25-Feb-2026

    Call On

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Call On

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Call On

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 05-Aug-2025

    Call On

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 04-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 03-May-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 24-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 20-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 16-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 12-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 07-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 15-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 23-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 10-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 23-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 08-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 27-Oct-2023

    Objection

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 04-Sep-2023

    Objection

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 30-Jun-2023

    Objection

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 11-Apr-2023

    Objection

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 13-Feb-2023

    Objection

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 15-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 14-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 03-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    III Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 20-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 20-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 07-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 13-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 25-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 28-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 16-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 07-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 19-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 09-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 08-Feb-2021

    Issues

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 19-Dec-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 27-Nov-2020

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 9/2020 Thimmarajamma's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants Manjamma, Manjanna, and Prakash from interfering with her possession of schedule B and C properties was dismissed on 27 November 2020. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as substantial evidence is required to prove the disputed passages form part of her property, and the balance of convenience favored defendants who lack alternate access to their neighboring property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  40. 27-Nov-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 23-Nov-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 17-Nov-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 28-Sep-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 19-Sep-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 15-Sep-2020

    Compliance Sec.89 Order 10 Rule1 Of CPC

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 04-Sep-2020

    Amendment

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 31-Aug-2020

    Amendment

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 26-Aug-2020

    OrdersView PDF

  49. 26-Aug-2020

    Amendment

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 21-Aug-2020

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 17-Aug-2020

    Orders

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 20-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 10-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 03-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 30-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 29-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 08-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 30-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 17-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 10-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 03-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 26-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 17-Feb-2020

    Written Statement And Objection

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 07-Feb-2020

    Written Statement And Objection

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  65. 04-Feb-2020

    Notice

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  66. 09-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 08-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 9/2020 Thimmarajamma's application for temporary injunction restraining defendants Manjamma, Manjanna, and Prakash from interfering with her possession of schedule B and C properties was dismissed on 27 November 2020. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as substantial evidence is required to prove the disputed passages form part of her property, and the balance of convenience favored defendants who lack alternate access to their neighboring property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case