Vijay Kumar B T vs Anand B N — 2710/2022
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR510071162022
Filing Number
2710/2022
Filing Date
10-Nov-2022
Registration No
2710/2022
Registration Date
10-Nov-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ,HOSKOTE
Judge
1187-Senior Civil Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijay Kumar B T
Adv. S
-
2.Siddamma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anand B N
-
2.Venkatamma
-
3.B.V.Srinivas
-
4.Channappa
-
5.Venkat Swamy Uruf Venkataswamappa
Case History
-
18-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Argument S
Senior Civil Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Argument S
Senior Civil Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Oct-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 2710/2022 Outcome: Application allowed. The court permitted plaintiffs Vijay Kumar B T and Siddamma to implead a proposed defendant as Defendant No. 6 by amending their plaint under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC. The court found the proposed defendant was a proper and necessary party since defendants allegedly created a partition deed dated 18-11-2022 allotting the disputed property to him, and his absence would defeat the suit's purpose and create multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2025
Call on ..
Senior Civil Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
Orders.
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Orders.
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Feb-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
20-Sep-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
26-Mar-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
06-Dec-2023
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
30-Sep-2023
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Mar-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Jan-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 2710/2022
Case Summary: O.S. 2710/2022 Outcome: Application allowed. The court permitted plaintiffs Vijay Kumar B T and Siddamma to implead a proposed defendant as Defendant No. 6 by amending their plaint under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC. The court found the proposed defendant was a proper and necessary party since defendants allegedly created a partition deed dated 18-11-2022 allotting the disputed property to him, and his absence would defeat the suit's purpose and create multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts