Padmamma vs Narayanappa — 900/2023
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CPC. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR510015262023
Filing Number
900/2023
Filing Date
26-Sep-2023
Registration No
900/2023
Registration Date
26-Sep-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ,HOSKOTE
Judge
1187-Senior Civil Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Padmamma
Adv. SY Ashok kumar
-
2.Gowramma
-
3.Parvathamma
-
4.Ashwini
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narayanappa
-
2.Radhamma
-
3.Nagesh
-
4.Ranganath
-
5.Anitha
-
6.Rani
-
7.Shanthamma
-
8.Venu
-
9.Bhaskar
-
10.Kiran
-
11.Ramanjinappa
-
12.Manjunath
-
13.Kavitha
-
14.Suma
-
15.Nethra
-
16.Sai ram
-
17.Krishna reddy
-
18.Bhaskar
-
19.Srinivas
-
20.Nagamani
-
21.N Ashok
-
22.SCV Reddy
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
03-May-2025
Call on ..
Senior Civil Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Call on ..
Senior Civil Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case 900/2023 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction, restraining defendant No.1 from alienating, encumbering, or creating documents over the disputed property pending trial. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the property is joint family property of Hindu undivided family members, and that allowing alienation would defeat the partition suit's purpose and cause irreparable harm to plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Oct-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
06-Jun-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
16-Jan-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
15-Jan-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 900/2023
Case 900/2023 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction, restraining defendant No.1 from alienating, encumbering, or creating documents over the disputed property pending trial. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case that the property is joint family property of Hindu undivided family members, and that allowing alienation would defeat the partition suit's purpose and cause irreparable harm to plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts