Shamanthu N vs S N Raja @S Nagaraja Rao — 246/2026
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 30th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR510003072026
Filing Number
243/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
246/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ,HOSKOTE
Judge
1187-Senior Civil Judge
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shamanthu N
Adv. Rajayoga.K
Respondent(s)
-
1.S N Raja @S Nagaraja Rao
-
2.Brundamma @ Brunda
-
3.S N Srinivas
-
4.N Nagamani
-
5.N Usha
-
6.Sandhya S N
-
7.Vanitha N Manjunath
-
8.Padmavathi
-
9.Pushpalatha
-
10.S R Ramarao
-
11.Swarnalatha
-
12.Brundamma @Brunda
-
13.L Sreedharamurthy
-
14.L Krishnamurthy
-
15.Suvarna
-
16.Mahalakshmi
-
17.S Narendra Babu
-
18.Navya S
-
19.L Sudarshana
-
20.Srimathi
-
21.L Vedavathi
-
22.Srinath L
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Shamanthu N v. S N Raja (246/2026) The Senior Civil Judge decreed the suit on 30-04-2026 based on a compromise settlement agreed upon by petitioner Shamanthu N and the defendants. After procedural matters including dismissal against defendant D9, impleading additional parties, and allowing a GPA holder to represent defendants, both parties reached a compromise and filed a compromise petition under CPC Rule 23(3), which the court allowed. The final decree incorporates the terms of the compromise settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Senior Civil Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Call on ..
Senior Civil Judge
-
25-Apr-2026
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 246/2026
Case Summary: Shamanthu N v. S N Raja (246/2026) The Senior Civil Judge decreed the suit on 30-04-2026 based on a compromise settlement agreed upon by petitioner Shamanthu N and the defendants. After procedural matters including dismissal against defendant D9, impleading additional parties, and allowing a GPA holder to represent defendants, both parties reached a compromise and filed a compromise petition under CPC Rule 23(3), which the court allowed. The final decree incorporates the terms of the compromise settlement between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts