Venkataraju C vs Shashikumar C N — 441/2025
Case under U/s 200 Crpc R/w Sec 138 N I Act Section 138NIAct. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd September 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KABR500097672025
Filing Number
442/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
441/2025
Registration Date
27-Nov-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSKOTE
Judge
1267-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Venkataraju C
Adv. Ashoka Babu
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shashikumar C N
Case History
-
02-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2026
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Orders
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Feb-2026
Deposition
In PCR 441/2025, petitioner Venkataraju C (PW1) testified on 12.02.2026 before the II Additional Chief Justice & JMFC, Hosakote. The complainant filed an affidavit in lieu of sworn statement and produced documentary evidence including a cheque (No.914084, dated 22.11.2022), endorsement, legal notice (dated 15.12.2022), postal receipts, and a returned postal cover with enclosed notice. The witness testimony was recorded, read over, interpreted, and accepted as correct with no re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
Orders
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Dec-2025
sworn statement
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 441/2025
In PCR 441/2025, petitioner Venkataraju C (PW1) testified on 12.02.2026 before the II Additional Chief Justice & JMFC, Hosakote. The complainant filed an affidavit in lieu of sworn statement and produced documentary evidence including a cheque (No.914084, dated 22.11.2022), endorsement, legal notice (dated 15.12.2022), postal receipts, and a returned postal cover with enclosed notice. The witness testimony was recorded, read over, interpreted, and accepted as correct with no re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts