Chandregowda H M vs Puneeth V — 418/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,138 NIACT. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KABR500096832025

Filing Number

418/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

418/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSKOTE

Judge

101-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,138 NIACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandregowda H M

    Adv. Narayanaswamy R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Puneeth V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 418/2025 Summary The court took cognizance of a cheque dishonor complaint filed by Chandregowda H M against Puneeth V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque of Rs. 5,00,000. The magistrate found that all statutory requirements were satisfied—cheque dated 15.09.2025, bank rejection on 03.10.2025, legal notice on 09.10.2025, and complaint filed within the prescribed timeline—and that sufficient materials existed to proceed. Accordingly, cognizance was taken and summons were issued to the accused, returnable by 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 418/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 418/2025 Summary The court took cognizance of a cheque dishonor complaint filed by Chandregowda H M against Puneeth V under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a bounced cheque of Rs. 5,00,000. The magistrate found that all statutory requirements were satisfied—cheque dated 15.09.2025, bank rejection on 03.10.2025, legal notice on 09.10.2025, and complaint filed within the prescribed timeline—and that sufficient materials existed to proceed. Accordingly, cognizance was taken and summons were issued to the accused, returnable by 17.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case