Sudha Maiya vs Atul Kumar K N — 130/2025
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section CPC. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR500033632025
Filing Number
131/2025
Filing Date
19-Apr-2025
Registration No
130/2025
Registration Date
19-Apr-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSKOTE
Judge
101-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sudha Maiya
Adv. D S MAli Patil
-
2.Vidya Maiya
Respondent(s)
-
1.Atul Kumar K N
-
2.B Prasannaiah
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS 130/2025 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosakote Date: 15 April 2026 Plaintiffs Sudha Maiya and Vidya Maiya sought temporary injunction to restrain defendants Atul Kumar K N and B Prasannaiah from interfering with their possession of a 10,000 sq ft property in Bengaluru. The court rejected the plaintiffs' application and vacated the ad-interim temporary injunction previously granted, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case due to a prior 2004 judgment declaring Smt. Narayanamma as the absolute owner, with ongoing execution proceedings (Ex. Petition 83/2005) already providing the plaintiffs an adequate remedy to adjudicate their title claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Call on
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2026
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jul-2025
written statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2025
written statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Apr-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
24-Apr-2025
Summons to defendents
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Apr-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 130/2025
Case Summary: OS 130/2025 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Hosakote Date: 15 April 2026 Plaintiffs Sudha Maiya and Vidya Maiya sought temporary injunction to restrain defendants Atul Kumar K N and B Prasannaiah from interfering with their possession of a 10,000 sq ft property in Bengaluru. The court rejected the plaintiffs' application and vacated the ad-interim temporary injunction previously granted, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case due to a prior 2004 judgment declaring Smt. Narayanamma as the absolute owner, with ongoing execution proceedings (Ex. Petition 83/2005) already providing the plaintiffs an adequate remedy to adjudicate their title claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts