Nandagudi PS vs Ramakka — 1728/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504IPC. Status: Evidence... Next hearing: 01st August 2026.

Evidence.. Next hearing 01-Aug-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABR500027412017

Filing Number

1731/2017

Filing Date

04-Dec-2017

Registration No

1728/2017

Registration Date

04-Dec-2017

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSKOTE

Judge

1267-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

NANDAGUDI PS

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,504IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nandagudi PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramakka

  2. 2.Ambarish

Case History

  1. 01-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 25-May-2026

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 23-May-2026

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 27-Dec-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 1728/2017 Outcome: The case was adjourned. A police witness (retired H.C. from Nandagudi Police Station) testified regarding FIR 69/2017 filed under IPC sections 324, 504, and 34 on March 14, 2017, involving alleged assault at Lingapur. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court with cross-examination completed. The court found significant procedural irregularities in the police investigation, including fabricated panchnama (site inspection) documents, lack of proper witness signatures, and contradictory statements. No further cross-examination was ordered. The matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 17-Aug-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 15-May-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 16-Mar-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 26-Dec-2023

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 27-Apr-2023

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 09-Mar-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 09-Mar-2023

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 29-Dec-2022

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 08-Nov-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  32. 08-Nov-2022

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 22-Sep-2022

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 01-Sep-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 01-Sep-2022

    Evidence..

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 21-Jul-2022

    Issue NBW to accused

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 06-May-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 19-Mar-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 18-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 11-Oct-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 27-Jul-2021

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 13-May-2021

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 09-Feb-2021

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 24-Nov-2020

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 21-Jul-2020

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 05-May-2020

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 16-Apr-2020

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 10-Mar-2020

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 27-Dec-2019

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 14-Dec-2019

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 07-Nov-2019

    ChargeView PDF

  52. 07-Nov-2019

    Evidence..

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 24-Oct-2019

    Hearing Before Charge

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 14-Sep-2019

    Call on

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 26-Aug-2019

    Call on

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 24-Aug-2019

    Hearing Before Charge

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 21-Jun-2019

    Hearing Before Charge

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 03-Jun-2019

    Hearing Before Charge

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 25-Jan-2019

    Hearing Before Charge

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 25-Oct-2018

    Hearing Before Charge

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 26-Jul-2018

    OrdersView PDF

  62. 26-Jul-2018

    Call on

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 30-Apr-2018

    Summons to accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 01-Feb-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 04-Dec-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1728/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1728/2017 Outcome: The case was adjourned. A police witness (retired H.C. from Nandagudi Police Station) testified regarding FIR 69/2017 filed under IPC sections 324, 504, and 34 on March 14, 2017, involving alleged assault at Lingapur. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court with cross-examination completed. The court found significant procedural irregularities in the police investigation, including fabricated panchnama (site inspection) documents, lack of proper witness signatures, and contradictory statements. No further cross-examination was ordered. The matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case