Thippaiah vs Anjinappa — 117/2024
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section CPC. Status: Evidence... Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR500018052024
Filing Number
119/2024
Filing Date
13-Mar-2024
Registration No
117/2024
Registration Date
13-Mar-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSKOTE
Judge
1267-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thippaiah
Adv. Y V Radhakrishna
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anjinappa
-
2.Muniraju
-
3.Vishwanatha
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case 117/2024 Summary This is a property dispute case heard by the 2nd Senior Civil Court, Bengaluru on January 8, 2026. Petitioner Thippaiah challenged respondents Anjinappa, Muniraju, and Vishwanatha regarding boundary encroachment and access to his land. The petitioner alleged the respondents installed barbed wire fencing on his property, damaged the road, and obstructed access to his house. The respondents claimed the petitioner filed a false case to usurp their land. The court examined witness testimony regarding the boundaries established under a prior settlement decree (O.S. 737/1996) and found contradictions in the petitioner's statements about the scheduled property boundaries. The hearing was adjourned to allow the respondent's counsel additional time for cross-examination of the petitioner's witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence..
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2024
IssueView PDF
-
21-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Oct-2024
Issues
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2024
Issues
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Sep-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
30-Sep-2024
Issues
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Sep-2024
Orders
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2024
Orders
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Sep-2024
Hearing on IA
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2024
Hearing
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2024
Hearing on IA
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2024
Hearing on IA
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jul-2024
written statement
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-May-2024
written statement
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2024
Summons to defendents
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2024
Case 117/2024 Summary This is a property dispute case heard by the 2nd Senior Civil Court, Bengaluru on January 8, 2026. Petitioner Thippaiah challenged respondents Anjinappa, Muniraju, and Vishwanatha regarding boundary encroachment and access to his land. The petitioner alleged the respondents installed barbed wire fencing on his property, damaged the road, and obstructed access to his house. The respondents claimed the petitioner filed a false case to usurp their land. The court examined witness testimony regarding the boundaries established under a prior settlement decree (O.S. 737/1996) and found contradictions in the petitioner's statements about the scheduled property boundaries. The hearing was adjourned to allow the respondent's counsel additional time for cross-examination of the petitioner's witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts