Venkatalakshmamma vs The Tahsildar — 1197/2025

Case under 13 Clause 3 and 14 of Birth and Death Act 1969. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABR420121302025

Filing Number

1210/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

1197/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

99-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

13 Clause 3 and 14 of Birth and Death Act 1969

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Venkatalakshmamma

    Adv. AMBAREESHA C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 1197/2025 The court allowed Venkatalakshmamma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, to register the death of her father-in-law, Sri Narasappa (who died on 10.03.1922), and directed the Tahsildar to issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioner satisfactorily established the death through family tree affidavit, public notice without objection, and unchallenged testimony, and held that denying the certificate would cause hardship as it is an essential legal document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1197/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1197/2025 The court allowed Venkatalakshmamma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, to register the death of her father-in-law, Sri Narasappa (who died on 10.03.1922), and directed the Tahsildar to issue a death certificate. The court found that the petitioner satisfactorily established the death through family tree affidavit, public notice without objection, and unchallenged testimony, and held that denying the certificate would cause hardship as it is an essential legal document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case