Narasimharaju vs The Tahasildar — 782/2025

Case under 13 Clause 3 and 14 of Birth and Death Act 1969. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABR420083692025

Filing Number

794/2025

Filing Date

12-Sep-2025

Registration No

782/2025

Registration Date

12-Sep-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

99-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

13 Clause 3 and 14 of Birth and Death Act 1969

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Narasimharaju

    Adv. Pranav Samrud

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahasildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed Narasimharaju's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register his grandfather Muninarasappa's death date as 07.02.1945 and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's evidence unchallenged, noting family illiteracy caused the original non-registration, and the death certificate was reasonably needed for property khata changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Orders.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Orders.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Orders.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 782/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Narasimharaju's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register his grandfather Muninarasappa's death date as 07.02.1945 and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's evidence unchallenged, noting family illiteracy caused the original non-registration, and the death certificate was reasonably needed for property khata changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case