DODDABELAVANGALA PS vs VINOD KUMAR K AND ANOTHER — 1984/2020

Status: Framing Of Charge Or Plea. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Framing Of Charge Or Plea Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABR420025432020

Filing Number

1984/2020

Filing Date

17-Aug-2020

Registration No

1984/2020

Registration Date

17-Aug-2020

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

99-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DODDABELAVANGALA PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR K AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: 1984/2020 Outcome: The court rejected the discharge application filed by accused Vinod Kumar K and Mohammad Shafi under Section 239 of CrPC. The accused were charged under Section 380 of IPC (theft) for allegedly stealing jewelry from the complainant's house. Despite arguments that the complaint was vague, delayed, and lacked evidence, the court found sufficient material in the chargesheet to proceed to trial, ruling the charges were not groundless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    objections

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 06-Oct-2025

    objections

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    objections

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    objections

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 22-Jul-2025

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 23-Jun-2025

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 18-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 30-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 28-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 29-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 12-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 16-Apr-2024

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 23-Jan-2024

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 19-Oct-2023

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 21-Aug-2023

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 11-May-2023

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 10-May-2023

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 28-Feb-2023

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 22-Nov-2022

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 23-Sep-2022

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 20-Jul-2022

    Summons

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 10-Mar-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 01-Dec-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 05-Aug-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 18-May-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 10-Feb-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 18-Dec-2020

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 20-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 17-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1984/2020

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 1984/2020 Outcome: The court rejected the discharge application filed by accused Vinod Kumar K and Mohammad Shafi under Section 239 of CrPC. The accused were charged under Section 380 of IPC (theft) for allegedly stealing jewelry from the complainant's house. Despite arguments that the complaint was vague, delayed, and lacked evidence, the court found sufficient material in the chargesheet to proceed to trial, ruling the charges were not groundless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case