DODDABELAVANGALA PS vs RAJ KIRAN R — 1767/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABR420020982020

Filing Number

1767/2020

Filing Date

27-Jun-2020

Registration No

1767/2020

Registration Date

27-Jun-2020

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

99-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DODDABELAVANGALA PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KIRAN R

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 1767/2020 Court: Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Doddabelavangala Date: September 2, 2025 Witness Examination: Witness PW-3 (Ramchandra, age 60) testified regarding a panchanama (official inspection record). The witness identified his signature on the panchanama document (marked as NIP-2(B)) and claimed it was made approximately 4 years ago during a road inspection, with witnesses present. Police conducted the accident site panchanama between 3:00-3:30 PM and seized a truck container. The witness identified vehicles in photographs (NIP-3 and NIP-4). Witness Admission: During cross-examination, the witness (representing the B.C. ACRPC side) admitted that police did not properly summon him as a panchayet, that he did not personally witness the panchanama being conducted, and that he signed a pre-written document prepared by police at the station. He further admitted the panchanama contents were not known to him and denied personally witnessing vehicle seizure, effectively conceding his testimony was false. Order: Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 15-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 20-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 02-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 08-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 29-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 17-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 23-Sep-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 02-Sep-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 20-Jul-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 13-Apr-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 10-Feb-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 27-Dec-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 30-Sep-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 11-Aug-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 21-Apr-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 25-Feb-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 07-Jan-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 06-Nov-2020

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 11-Sep-2020

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 30-Jul-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 27-Jun-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1767/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1767/2020 Court: Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Doddabelavangala Date: September 2, 2025 Witness Examination: Witness PW-3 (Ramchandra, age 60) testified regarding a panchanama (official inspection record). The witness identified his signature on the panchanama document (marked as NIP-2(B)) and claimed it was made approximately 4 years ago during a road inspection, with witnesses present. Police conducted the accident site panchanama between 3:00-3:30 PM and seized a truck container. The witness identified vehicles in photographs (NIP-3 and NIP-4). Witness Admission: During cross-examination, the witness (representing the B.C. ACRPC side) admitted that police did not properly summon him as a panchayet, that he did not personally witness the panchanama being conducted, and that he signed a pre-written document prepared by police at the station. He further admitted the panchanama contents were not known to him and denied personally witnessing vehicle seizure, effectively conceding his testimony was false. Order: Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case