Doddabelavangala P S vs kempegowda and others — 418/2016

Case under Section u/s323447504r/w34IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABR420010472016

Registration No

418/2016

Registration Date

14-Jun-2016

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

99-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section u/s323447504r/w34IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Doddabelavangala P S

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.kempegowda and others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 418/2016 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Kempegowda and others) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 447, and 504 with Section 34, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Both prosecution witnesses—the complainant (PW-1) and eyewitness (PW-2)—testified that the accused did not trespass on the land, did not abuse them with obscene words, and did not assault them. The complainant even stated he filed the case due to a land dispute with the accused. This credible contradictory evidence from the prosecution's own witnesses fatally weakened the case, leaving no reliable proof of the alleged offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 04-May-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 28-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 02-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 30-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 05-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 20-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 19-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 27-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 04-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 30-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 24-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 06-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 11-Oct-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 18-Aug-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 02-Jun-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 12-Mar-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 31-Dec-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 28-Oct-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 27-Aug-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 02-Jul-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 18-May-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 04-May-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 13-Feb-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 17-Jan-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 11-Nov-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 23-Oct-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 30-Sep-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 14-Jun-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 04-Apr-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 31-Jan-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 26-Oct-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 18-Jul-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 13-Jun-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 03-May-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 18-Jan-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 26-Oct-2017

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  65. 14-Jun-2017

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  66. 15-Mar-2017

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  67. 09-Nov-2016

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  68. 26-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  69. Case filed

    Registration No. 418/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 418/2016 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Kempegowda and others) of charges under IPC Sections 323, 447, and 504 with Section 34, finding the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Both prosecution witnesses—the complainant (PW-1) and eyewitness (PW-2)—testified that the accused did not trespass on the land, did not abuse them with obscene words, and did not assault them. The complainant even stated he filed the case due to a land dispute with the accused. This credible contradictory evidence from the prosecution's own witnesses fatally weakened the case, leaving no reliable proof of the alleged offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case