Belavangala P.S vs Huchamma and Others — 54/2017

Case under . Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABR420000802017

Filing Number

54/2017

Filing Date

06-Jan-2017

Registration No

54/2017

Registration Date

06-Jan-2017

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

99-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Belavangala P.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Huchamma and Others

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Belavangala P.S. v. Huchamma and Others (54/2017) The court acquitted the two accused of charges under IPC Section 447 with 34 and Karnataka Land Act Section 192(a) for alleged encroachment on government land designated for a school playground. The prosecution failed to establish with clear documentary evidence which specific portions of the 4-acre-28-guntas land the accused had unlawfully encroached upon, as the exact boundaries were never properly demarcated. Given reasonable doubt and insufficient proof, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgments

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    313 statement

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 17-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 02-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 02-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 16-Jul-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 21-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 13-May-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 18-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 30-Jan-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 07-Jan-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 28-Nov-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 09-Oct-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 03-Sep-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 15-Jul-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 06-Apr-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 13-Feb-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 27-Nov-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 22-Nov-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 06-Oct-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 24-Aug-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 12-Jul-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 25-Apr-2023

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 23-Jan-2023

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 07-Nov-2022

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 15-Sep-2022

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 21-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 15-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 24-Feb-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 03-Feb-2022

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 18-Nov-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 09-Sep-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 06-May-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 03-Feb-2021

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 17-Dec-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 16-Oct-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 13-Aug-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 10-Jun-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 24-Feb-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 21-Feb-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 02-Jan-2020

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 12-Nov-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 25-Jul-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 02-May-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 13-Feb-2019

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 23-Nov-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  65. 30-Aug-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  66. 11-Jul-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  67. 06-Dec-2017

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  68. 03-Aug-2017

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  69. 19-Apr-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 06-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Belavangala P.S. v. Huchamma and Others (54/2017) The court acquitted the two accused of charges under IPC Section 447 with 34 and Karnataka Land Act Section 192(a) for alleged encroachment on government land designated for a school playground. The prosecution failed to establish with clear documentary evidence which specific portions of the 4-acre-28-guntas land the accused had unlawfully encroached upon, as the exact boundaries were never properly demarcated. Given reasonable doubt and insufficient proof, the court granted the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case