PADAMMA ALISA PADMA vs NAVEEN R — 1173/2024
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1. Status: Objections To I.A.. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR410015062024
Filing Number
1181/2024
Filing Date
03-Oct-2024
Registration No
1173/2024
Registration Date
03-Oct-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR
Judge
632-Senior Civil Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PADAMMA ALISA PADMA
Adv. S VENUGOPAL
-
2.KRISHNAPPA
-
3.NAVEEN K
-
4.PRAVEEN K
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAVEEN R
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Argument S
Senior Civil Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 1173/2024 The main hearing was completed on 26.11.2025. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted and the court found the facts stated therein to be correct. The respondent's default in filing a reply was noted, and the preliminary objection was dismissed due to non-filing of the counter-statement by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Oct-2024
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
21-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1173/2024
Summary of Case 1173/2024 The main hearing was completed on 26.11.2025. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted and the court found the facts stated therein to be correct. The respondent's default in filing a reply was noted, and the preliminary objection was dismissed due to non-filing of the counter-statement by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts