Gowramma vs Anjinamma — 881/2022
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CPC. Status: Issues.. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR410011862022
Filing Number
886/2022
Filing Date
04-Nov-2022
Registration No
881/2022
Registration Date
04-Nov-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR
Judge
632-Senior Civil Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gowramma
Adv. NARENDRABABU
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anjinamma
-
2.Appaiah
-
3.Muniyamma
-
4.Nagaraju
-
5.Krishnappa
-
6.PANISH CHANDRA JAWALIU
-
7.SURESH S
-
8.NAGARAJ.A.S
-
9.M.S MARG DARSHAN INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Issues.
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S.No. 881/2022 - Gowramma v. Anjinamma et al. Gowramma filed an interlocutory application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain defendants 6-10 from constructing on disputed properties in a partition suit. The court dismissed the application, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The court determined that the ancestral properties were lawfully partitioned in 1995 among Doddaiah's heirs, with defendants 2, 4 & 5 subsequently alienating their share to defendant 6 in 2003 (20 years prior), which the plaintiff never challenged. The properties were converted to non-agricultural land in 2003 and further sold to defendants 7-10 in 2025, with revenue records updated accordingly. No temporary injunction was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Issues.
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
02-Aug-2024
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Mar-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Feb-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
16-Jan-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Nov-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Oct-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Aug-2023
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Jul-2023
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Feb-2023
OrdersView PDF
-
24-Feb-2023
Notice
Senior Civil Judge
-
06-Feb-2023
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
01-Feb-2023
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
27-Jan-2023
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Jan-2023
Hearing
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Jan-2023
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
04-Jan-2023
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Nov-2022
T.I. Order Granted And S/S To Dfts
Senior Civil Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 881/2022
Case Summary: O.S.No. 881/2022 - Gowramma v. Anjinamma et al. Gowramma filed an interlocutory application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain defendants 6-10 from constructing on disputed properties in a partition suit. The court dismissed the application, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The court determined that the ancestral properties were lawfully partitioned in 1995 among Doddaiah's heirs, with defendants 2, 4 & 5 subsequently alienating their share to defendant 6 in 2003 (20 years prior), which the plaintiff never challenged. The properties were converted to non-agricultural land in 2003 and further sold to defendants 7-10 in 2025, with revenue records updated accordingly. No temporary injunction was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts