Siddalingaiah.A.G vs Puttagangamma — 867/2022

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CpC. Status: Issues.. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Issues. Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR410011632022

Filing Number

867/2022

Filing Date

31-Oct-2022

Registration No

867/2022

Registration Date

31-Oct-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

632-Senior Civil Judge

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CpC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Siddalingaiah.A.G

    Adv. C.Vijay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Puttagangamma

  2. 2.Shivashankar

  3. 3.Devaraju.B

  4. 4.Gagan.N.

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 867/2022 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was dismissed, and the previously granted ex parte temporary injunction order dated 04.11.2022 was vacated. No costs awarded. Key Finding: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The plaintiff had suppressed material facts regarding revenue court proceedings where the Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner had already determined defendant No.1's rights over the disputed land (0.35 guntas), which was subsequently sold to defendant No.4 through registered deeds. The plaintiff presented no documentary evidence supporting his claim to this excess land portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Issues.

    Senior Civil Judge

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Senior Civil Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Senior Civil Judge

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  15. 17-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  16. 17-Jun-2025

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  17. 02-Apr-2025

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Notice

    Senior Civil Judge

  19. 18-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  20. 30-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  21. 31-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  22. 19-Apr-2024

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  23. 13-Feb-2024

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  24. 13-Dec-2023

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  25. 22-Nov-2023

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  26. 16-Sep-2023

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  27. 14-Jul-2023

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  28. 11-Apr-2023

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  29. 17-Feb-2023

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  30. 05-Dec-2022

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  31. 04-Nov-2022

    T.I. Order Granted And S/S To Dfts

    Senior Civil Judge

  32. 03-Nov-2022

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  33. 02-Nov-2022

    First Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  34. 31-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 31-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 867/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 867/2022 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was dismissed, and the previously granted ex parte temporary injunction order dated 04.11.2022 was vacated. No costs awarded. Key Finding: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The plaintiff had suppressed material facts regarding revenue court proceedings where the Assistant Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner had already determined defendant No.1's rights over the disputed land (0.35 guntas), which was subsequently sold to defendant No.4 through registered deeds. The plaintiff presented no documentary evidence supporting his claim to this excess land portion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case