Smt. H M Savithri vs H M Bhaskar — 385/2025

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--PLAINT REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR410004622025

Filing Number

385/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

385/2025

Registration Date

11-Mar-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

632-Senior Civil Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PLAINT REJECTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. H M Savithri

    Adv. NARASIMHAMURTHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H M Bhaskar

  2. 2.H N Sunitha

  3. 3.H N Madhu

  4. 4.H N Manasa

  5. 5.Lakshmisha D A

  6. 6.Sridevi D A

  7. 7.H M Shamala

  8. 8.H M Geetha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 385/2025 The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for partition and separate possession, finding it barred by limitation and lacking a valid cause of action. The plaintiff, a 68-year-old woman, sought a 1/6th share in ancestral properties, claiming she was fraudulently induced to execute a release deed in 2007 without receiving compensation. However, the court found that the plaintiff had knowledge of the 2007 partition among family members, actively consented to it, and signed the release deed, yet waited 18 years before challenging it—far exceeding the 3-year limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior Civil Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  12. 18-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  13. 17-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  18. 02-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  19. 21-Apr-2025

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  20. 09-Apr-2025

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  21. 05-Apr-2025

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  22. 02-Apr-2025

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  23. 12-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  24. 11-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 385/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 385/2025 The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for partition and separate possession, finding it barred by limitation and lacking a valid cause of action. The plaintiff, a 68-year-old woman, sought a 1/6th share in ancestral properties, claiming she was fraudulently induced to execute a release deed in 2007 without receiving compensation. However, the court found that the plaintiff had knowledge of the 2007 partition among family members, actively consented to it, and signed the release deed, yet waited 18 years before challenging it—far exceeding the 3-year limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case