Sharadamma vs Munichannaiah — 325/2020
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CPC. Status: Evidenc. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR410004482020
Filing Number
325/2020
Filing Date
30-Sep-2020
Registration No
325/2020
Registration Date
30-Sep-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR
Judge
632-Senior Civil Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sharadamma
Adv. VENKATACHALA B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Munichannaiah
-
2.Gangalakshmamma
-
3.Ramanjinappa
-
4.Gangamuniyappa
-
5.Rangaiah
Case History
-
28-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary of Case 325/2020 Sharadamma filed a suit against Munichannaiah, Gangalakshmamma, and Ramanjinappa (and others) seeking partition and a 1/4 share in ancestral joint family property. Defendant No.4 sought temporary injunction to restrain Defendant No.5 from alienating the suit property. The court dismissed the injunction application, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The property was alienated in 1987, but the plaintiff waited 38 years before filing suit without challenging that transaction, causing the suit to be barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
06-Sep-2025
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Orders
Senior Civil Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
30-Jul-2024
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Jun-2024
Objections To I.A.
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Feb-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
11-Oct-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
02-Sep-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
31-Jul-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
01-Apr-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
30-Jan-2023
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
30-Nov-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Oct-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
01-Oct-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
20-Jul-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
20-Jun-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Apr-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
05-Mar-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
28-Feb-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
25-Jan-2022
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Nov-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Sep-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
11-Aug-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
19-Jul-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
22-Mar-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Mar-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
12-Jan-2021
Evidenc
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Dec-2020
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
23-Oct-2020
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
09-Oct-2020
Summons
Senior Civil Judge
-
08-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 325/2020
Summary of Case 325/2020 Sharadamma filed a suit against Munichannaiah, Gangalakshmamma, and Ramanjinappa (and others) seeking partition and a 1/4 share in ancestral joint family property. Defendant No.4 sought temporary injunction to restrain Defendant No.5 from alienating the suit property. The court dismissed the injunction application, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The property was alienated in 1987, but the plaintiff waited 38 years before filing suit without challenging that transaction, causing the suit to be barred by limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts