Anjaneya Reddy.H. vs Chandrakala — 257/2022

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CPC. Status: Issue. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Issue Next hearing 20-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR410003582022

Filing Number

257/2022

Filing Date

31-Mar-2022

Registration No

257/2022

Registration Date

31-Mar-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODBALLAPUR

Judge

632-Senior Civil Judge

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anjaneya Reddy.H.

    Adv. Sri.A.R.Ramakrishna

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakala

  2. 2.Nitish

  3. 3.Srinivasa Reddy M

  4. 4.The Deputy commissioner

  5. 5.The Tahasildar

  6. 6.Doddaballapura Planning Authority

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Issue

    Senior Civil Judge

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Issue

    Senior Civil Judge

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 257/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed defendants' application (I.A. No. VII) seeking rejection of the plaintiff's plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) & (d) CPC. The suit proceeds to trial. Key Issue: Plaintiff Anjaneya Reddy sought declaration of his right to use a 15×20 feet road and injunction against defendants, based on a compromise decree from an earlier partition suit (O.S. No. 10/2006) that required the road be preserved for all parties' use. Defendants claimed the plaintiff had no cause of action. The court found sufficient cause of action exists and the suit is maintainable, as the plaint adequately alleges violation of compromise decree terms regarding the preserved road. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Issue

    Senior Civil Judge

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  8. 06-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  12. 06-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  16. 08-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  17. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  18. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  19. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  20. 03-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  21. 27-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  22. 20-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  23. 12-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  24. 17-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  25. 05-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  26. 12-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  27. 18-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  28. 14-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  29. 15-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  30. 27-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  31. 27-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  32. 22-Apr-2024

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  33. 20-Apr-2024

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  34. 30-Mar-2024

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  35. 21-Mar-2024

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  36. 27-Feb-2024

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  37. 19-Jan-2024

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  38. 19-Dec-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  39. 18-Dec-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  40. 22-Nov-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  41. 12-Oct-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  42. 26-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  43. 13-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  44. 12-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  45. 11-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  46. 08-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  47. 07-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  48. 05-Sep-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  49. 31-Aug-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  50. 16-Aug-2023

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge

  51. 09-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  52. 21-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  53. 13-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  54. 07-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  55. 26-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  56. 12-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  57. 15-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  58. 24-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge

  59. 17-Mar-2023

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  60. 24-Feb-2023

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  61. 15-Feb-2023

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  62. 10-Jan-2023

    Objections To I.A.

    Senior Civil Judge

  63. 16-Dec-2022

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  64. 02-Nov-2022

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  65. 21-Sep-2022

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  66. 20-Aug-2022

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  67. 15-Jul-2022

    Summons

    Senior Civil Judge

  68. 14-Jun-2022

    Notice

    Senior Civil Judge

  69. 08-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 31-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 257/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 257/2022 Outcome: The court dismissed defendants' application (I.A. No. VII) seeking rejection of the plaintiff's plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) & (d) CPC. The suit proceeds to trial. Key Issue: Plaintiff Anjaneya Reddy sought declaration of his right to use a 15×20 feet road and injunction against defendants, based on a compromise decree from an earlier partition suit (O.S. No. 10/2006) that required the road be preserved for all parties' use. Defendants claimed the plaintiff had no cause of action. The court found sufficient cause of action exists and the suit is maintainable, as the plaint adequately alleges violation of compromise decree terms regarding the preserved road. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case