H R CHANCHALA vs MADHUSUDHAN K — 65/2024
Case under Under Order 96 Rw Order 41 Rule 1 of the Cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABR400003922024
Filing Number
65/2024
Filing Date
14-Aug-2024
Registration No
65/2024
Registration Date
17-Aug-2024
Court
IV ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, SITTING AT DODBALLAPUR
Judge
981-IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.H R CHANCHALA
Adv. M KRISHNA MURTHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADHUSUDHAN K
-
2.MOHANA. S.
-
3.IDDCO- TOKIO GENRAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: M.V.C No. 65/2024 On 16.06.2026, witness PW-1 (petitioner H R Chanchala) testified regarding a motor vehicle collision damage claim. The witness contested the respondent insurance company's liability, arguing the compound wall damage was due to the vehicle getting stuck in drainage, not deliberate impact. The witness challenged the civil engineer's damage estimate of ₹1,34,890, claiming insufficient documentation for material costs and labor charges. The court found the petitioner failed to substantiate claims with supporting documents, concluding the third respondent (insurance company) is not liable to pay the claimed compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Call on
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Call on
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
Hearing
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Hearing
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-May-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2024
Case Summary: M.V.C No. 65/2024 On 16.06.2026, witness PW-1 (petitioner H R Chanchala) testified regarding a motor vehicle collision damage claim. The witness contested the respondent insurance company's liability, arguing the compound wall damage was due to the vehicle getting stuck in drainage, not deliberate impact. The witness challenged the civil engineer's damage estimate of ₹1,34,890, claiming insufficient documentation for material costs and labor charges. The court found the petitioner failed to substantiate claims with supporting documents, concluding the third respondent (insurance company) is not liable to pay the claimed compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts