Sri. Eshwar Naik vs Doddaballapura Women Police station — 10050/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABR400001242026
Filing Number
10052/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
10050/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
IV ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, SITTING AT DODBALLAPUR
Judge
981-IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
DODDABALLAPURA WOMEN PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. Eshwar Naik
-
2.Sri. Nagesh Naik
-
3.Smt. S. Manjulabhai
-
4.Smt. Lakshmi Bai
-
5.Sri. Govindanaik
Respondent(s)
-
1.Doddaballapura Women Police station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary of Case 10050/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons charged under Sections 74, 352, 351(2) read with Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving allegations of verbal abuse, assault, and life threats. The judge found the allegations vague and general, noted suspicious delay in filing the complaint amid an existing counter-case (CC No. 621/2023), and emphasized that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," ordering release on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with standard investigative cooperation conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 10050/2026
Summary of Case 10050/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to five accused persons charged under Sections 74, 352, 351(2) read with Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, involving allegations of verbal abuse, assault, and life threats. The judge found the allegations vague and general, noted suspicious delay in filing the complaint amid an existing counter-case (CC No. 621/2023), and emphasized that "bail is a rule and jail is an exception," ordering release on personal bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each with standard investigative cooperation conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts