Sri. Chethan. S.N vs State of Karnataka — 10049/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 17th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABR400001232026
Filing Number
10051/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
10049/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
IV ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, SITTING AT DODBALLAPUR
Judge
981-IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
DODDABALLAPURA WOMEN PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. Chethan. S.N
-
2.Smt. Manjula
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Karnataka
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. No. 10049/2026 Court Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners (Sri. Chethan S.N. and Smt. Manjula) charged with dowry harassment and assault under sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while allegations of ill-treatment and dowry demands existed, no prima facie evidence of dowry demand was produced, and the offences were non-capital and magistrate-triable, warranting bail on humanitarian grounds and to preserve personal liberty. Conditions: Petitioners must execute personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 each with sureties, appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days, cooperate with investigation, refrain from threatening witnesses, and avoid similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 10049/2026
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. No. 10049/2026 Court Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners (Sri. Chethan S.N. and Smt. Manjula) charged with dowry harassment and assault under sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found that while allegations of ill-treatment and dowry demands existed, no prima facie evidence of dowry demand was produced, and the offences were non-capital and magistrate-triable, warranting bail on humanitarian grounds and to preserve personal liberty. Conditions: Petitioners must execute personal bonds of ₹1,00,000 each with sureties, appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days, cooperate with investigation, refrain from threatening witnesses, and avoid similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts