SHIVASHANKAR V vs M/S SHRI THIRUPATHI STEEL CAST LIMITED SRI MANOJ KUMAR — 22/2024
Case under Under Order 96 Rw Order 41 Rule 1 of the Cpc. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABR400000982024
Filing Number
22/2024
Filing Date
28-Feb-2024
Registration No
22/2024
Registration Date
29-Feb-2024
Court
IV ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, SITTING AT DODBALLAPUR
Judge
981-IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVASHANKAR V
Adv. RASHMI T V
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S SHRI THIRUPATHI STEEL CAST LIMITED SRI MANOJ KUMAR
-
2.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GEN INSURANCE CO LTD
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Summons
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Summons
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: MVC No. 22/2024 On 17.03.2026, the court heard witness testimony (PW-1) in this motor vehicle accident compensation case. The petitioner Shivashankar V claimed injuries and medical expenses of ₹70,000 from the accident. However, the opposing party (Respondent 2's counsel) contested liability, arguing the accident resulted from the petitioner's own negligence while driving on the wrong side of the road, and disputed the claimed injuries and expenses, denying the petitioner suffered any significant harm. The case was adjourned with Respondent 1 granted time to file their cross-examination response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Call on
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Call on
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Hearing
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-May-2025
Issues
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2025
Issues
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2025
Notice
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2024
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Notice
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Notice
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Sep-2024
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
08-Aug-2024
Notice
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Jul-2024
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
23-May-2024
Notice
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2024
Notice
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2024
Case Summary: MVC No. 22/2024 On 17.03.2026, the court heard witness testimony (PW-1) in this motor vehicle accident compensation case. The petitioner Shivashankar V claimed injuries and medical expenses of ₹70,000 from the accident. However, the opposing party (Respondent 2's counsel) contested liability, arguing the accident resulted from the petitioner's own negligence while driving on the wrong side of the road, and disputed the claimed injuries and expenses, denying the petitioner suffered any significant harm. The case was adjourned with Respondent 1 granted time to file their cross-examination response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts