HANUMAKKA vs JAGADISH K — 6/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section SEC,166. Status: Judgement.. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABR400000862025
Filing Number
5/2025
Filing Date
29-Jan-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
30-Jan-2025
Court
IV ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, SITTING AT DODBALLAPUR
Judge
981-IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HANUMAKKA
-
2.R K SANTHOSH REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER
-
3.R K SAGAR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAGADISH K
-
2.THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Judgement.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Arguments.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Arguments.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments.
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Call on
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: M.V.C No. 6/2025 This motor vehicle accident compensation case was heard on 13.01.2026. The court examined witness testimony and cross-examination by both sides' counsel. The petitioners (Hanumakka and the minors R K Santhosh and R K Sagar through their natural guardians) contended the accident occurred while the insurance policy was active and the driver was authorized. The respondents (Jagadish K and United India Insurance Company) contested liability and challenged the petitioners' claims. The court found certain contentions of the respondents unjustified regarding false statements in affidavits and determined that since the policy was valid at the time of the accident, liability rested with the respondent insurance company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Evidence
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Objection
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Steps
IV Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2025
Case Summary: M.V.C No. 6/2025 This motor vehicle accident compensation case was heard on 13.01.2026. The court examined witness testimony and cross-examination by both sides' counsel. The petitioners (Hanumakka and the minors R K Santhosh and R K Sagar through their natural guardians) contended the accident occurred while the insurance policy was active and the driver was authorized. The respondents (Jagadish K and United India Insurance Company) contested liability and challenged the petitioners' claims. The court found certain contentions of the respondents unjustified regarding false statements in affidavits and determined that since the policy was valid at the time of the accident, liability rested with the respondent insurance company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts