SRINIVAS @ SRINIVAS N vs THE TAHASILDAR, THE BIRTH AND DEATHS REGISTRAR, DEVANAHALLI — 502/2024
Case under Order 13 3 of Birth and Death Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABR320064162024
Filing Number
500/2024
Filing Date
20-Dec-2024
Registration No
502/2024
Registration Date
20-Dec-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
100-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRINIVAS @ SRINIVAS N
Adv. KRISHNA N
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASILDAR, THE BIRTH AND DEATHS REGISTRAR, DEVANAHALLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.502/2024 The Principal Civil Judge at Devanahalli allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildar/Birth & Death Registrar to enter the birth date of Prajwal S (born 05.03.2007) in the official register and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged evidence credible, supported by school documents, and applied precedent holding that under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act 1969, the magistrate's concern is merely ascertaining the fact of birth rather than precise date verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Feb-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2026
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2025
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-May-2025
Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 502/2024
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.502/2024 The Principal Civil Judge at Devanahalli allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildar/Birth & Death Registrar to enter the birth date of Prajwal S (born 05.03.2007) in the official register and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged evidence credible, supported by school documents, and applied precedent holding that under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act 1969, the magistrate's concern is merely ascertaining the fact of birth rather than precise date verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts