VIJAYAPURA POLICE STATION vs AZEEZ MUBARAK — 4022/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),351(3), 3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABR320057342024
Filing Number
4017/2024
Filing Date
26-Oct-2024
Registration No
4022/2024
Registration Date
26-Oct-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
1079-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
141
Police Station
VIJAYAPURA PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAYAPURA POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AZEEZ MUBARAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 4022/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Azeez Mubarak and Amreen) of all charges under IPC Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), and 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the three key prosecution witnesses (including the complainant) gave testimony completely contrary to the charges, contradicting the FIR allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found no credible evidence supporting the accusations and declared the accused not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Mar-2026
Summons
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2025
Summons
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Oct-2025
Summons
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jul-2025
Summons
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 4022/2024
Case Summary: 4022/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Azeez Mubarak and Amreen) of all charges under IPC Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), and 351(3) read with Section 3(5) of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the three key prosecution witnesses (including the complainant) gave testimony completely contrary to the charges, contradicting the FIR allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found no credible evidence supporting the accusations and declared the accused not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts