VISHWANATHAPURA P.S. vs AMBARISHA — 3283/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 4(1),4(1A),21,22OFMMRDACTR/WSECTION379OFIPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABR320050462015

Registration No

3283/2015

Registration Date

26-Sep-2015

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI

Judge

1079-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

MANDYA LOKAYUKTA PS

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 4(1),4(1A),21,22OFMMRDACTR/WSECTION379OFIPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHWANATHAPURA P.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMBARISHA

  2. 2.ANIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: VISHWANATHAPURA P.S. v. AMBARISHA AND ANIL (3283/2015) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Ambarisha and Anil) of charges under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (Sections 4(1), 4(1A), 21, 22) and Indian Penal Code Section 379, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution alleged illegal sand transportation but presented only oral testimony from official witnesses without corroborating documentary evidence, photographs of the crime scene, or seized materials properly documented. Critical gaps included failure to produce independent witnesses who directly observed the illegal activity, absence of proper site inspection records, and inability to prove the seized sand's connection to unauthorized quarrying. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Call On

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 10-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 13-May-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 08-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 26-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 19-May-2023

    Warrant

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 28-Feb-2023

    Warrant

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 21-Dec-2022

    Warrant

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 10-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 19-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 16-May-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 25-Jan-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 05-Oct-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 03-Jun-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 24-Mar-2021

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 13-Nov-2020

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 05-Oct-2020

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 23-Jun-2020

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 07-Apr-2020

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 02-Jan-2020

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 01-Jan-2020

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 21-Oct-2019

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 19-Aug-2019

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 17-Jun-2019

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 01-Apr-2019

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 28-Dec-2018

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 06-Dec-2018

    Restored

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 15-Jul-2017

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 10-Jul-2017

    For Committal

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 27-May-2017

    For Committal

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 07-Feb-2017

    For Committal

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 17-Jan-2017

    For Committal

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 04-Oct-2016

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 11-Jul-2016

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 18-Feb-2016

    Hbc

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 28-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. Case filed

    Registration No. 3283/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: VISHWANATHAPURA P.S. v. AMBARISHA AND ANIL (3283/2015) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Ambarisha and Anil) of charges under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (Sections 4(1), 4(1A), 21, 22) and Indian Penal Code Section 379, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The prosecution alleged illegal sand transportation but presented only oral testimony from official witnesses without corroborating documentary evidence, photographs of the crime scene, or seized materials properly documented. Critical gaps included failure to produce independent witnesses who directly observed the illegal activity, absence of proper site inspection records, and inability to prove the seized sand's connection to unauthorized quarrying. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case