YATHISH BABU ALIAS YATHISHA vs RUKMANI BAI — 423/2013

Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd September 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Sep-2026 in 4 weeks

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR320031562013

Filing Number

426/2013

Filing Date

31-May-2013

Registration No

423/2013

Registration Date

31-May-2013

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI

Judge

100-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YATHISH BABU ALIAS YATHISHA

    Adv. S.A. KHADRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUKMANI BAI

Case History

  1. 22-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: O.S. 423/2013 - Yathish Babu v. Rukmani Bai The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (IA No.VIII) seeking temporary injunction to prevent defendants from altering revenue records of disputed property. The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Although plaintiff claimed the property was allotted to him through oral family partition, defendant No.2 held a registered sale deed executed in 2000. The court ruled such title disputes require full trial and declined interim relief, noting granting the injunction would cause greater hardship to the defendant. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 30-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 10-Sep-2024

    Issues.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 04-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 29-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 06-Jun-2024

    Amendment

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 22-Apr-2024

    Amendment

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 28-Mar-2024

    Amendment

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 20-Mar-2024

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 13-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 16-Jan-2024

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 12-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 14-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 29-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 02-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 21-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 26-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 30-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 21-Jun-2022

    Issue

  37. 21-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 07-Apr-2022

    Orders

  39. 07-Apr-2022

    Issues.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 06-Apr-2022

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 15-Feb-2022

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 28-Jan-2022

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 06-Dec-2021

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 13-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 25-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 25-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 10-Nov-2020

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 14-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 17-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 30-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 03-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 25-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 10-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 03-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 30-May-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 29-May-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 23-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 22-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 15-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 16-Jan-2019

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 15-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 04-Sep-2018

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 02-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 21-Nov-2017

    Hearing

  65. 16-Dec-2016

    Objection

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  66. 16-Nov-2016

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  67. 17-Sep-2016

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  68. 16-Sep-2016

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  69. 04-Jun-2016

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  70. 26-Mar-2016

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  71. 05-Feb-2016

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  72. 10-Dec-2015

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  73. 14-Jul-2015

    Issues

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  74. 16-Sep-2014

    Summons

  75. 06-Aug-2014

    Summons

  76. 19-Jun-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 31-May-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 423/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 423/2013 - Yathish Babu v. Rukmani Bai The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (IA No.VIII) seeking temporary injunction to prevent defendants from altering revenue records of disputed property. The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Although plaintiff claimed the property was allotted to him through oral family partition, defendant No.2 held a registered sale deed executed in 2000. The court ruled such title disputes require full trial and declined interim relief, noting granting the injunction would cause greater hardship to the defendant. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case