MUNIYAMMA vs LAKSHMIDEVAMMA — 147/2016
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR320019982016
Filing Number
147/2016
Filing Date
29-Mar-2016
Registration No
147/2016
Registration Date
29-Mar-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
100-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUNIYAMMA
Adv. R.PRASANNAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAKSHMIDEVAMMA
-
2.NAGARAJ
Case History
-
19-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 147/2016 (Muniyamma v. Lakshmidevamma and Nagaraj) The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. III) seeking permission to appoint her son as General Power of Attorney (GPA) holder to prosecute the permanent injunction suit on her behalf. The court found that the plaintiff, being an elderly person suffering from age-related ailments, was unable to appear in court regularly, and that no legal impediment exists under Order 3 Rule 2(a) of the CPC for a party to conduct litigation through a GPA holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Mar-2024
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2024
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Aug-2023
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-May-2023
Amended Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Apr-2023
OrdersView PDF
-
06-Apr-2023
Amendment
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2023
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2023
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2022
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2022
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Aug-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Nov-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Oct-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jun-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Oct-2018
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jul-2018
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2018
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jan-2018
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2017
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2017
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Dec-2016
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2016
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Nov-2016
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2016
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2016
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Mar-2016
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Mar-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2016
Case Summary: O.S. No. 147/2016 (Muniyamma v. Lakshmidevamma and Nagaraj) The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No. III) seeking permission to appoint her son as General Power of Attorney (GPA) holder to prosecute the permanent injunction suit on her behalf. The court found that the plaintiff, being an elderly person suffering from age-related ailments, was unable to appear in court regularly, and that no legal impediment exists under Order 3 Rule 2(a) of the CPC for a party to conduct litigation through a GPA holder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts