YESU DASU W vs A. SUDHAKAR REDDY AND ANOTHER — 303/2012
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR320016462012
Registration No
303/2012
Registration Date
04-Feb-2012
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
100-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YESU DASU W
Respondent(s)
-
1.A. SUDHAKAR REDDY AND ANOTHER
Case History
-
18-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 303/2012 - YESU DASU W v. A. SUDHAKAR REDDY AND ANOTHER Outcome: The court allowed all three interim applications (I.A. III, IV, and V) filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to lead further chief examination and produce additional documents in a permanent injunction suit. I.A. III and IV were allowed with costs of Rs. 500 each; I.A. V was allowed unconditionally. The court found sufficient grounds permitting the plaintiff to adduce further oral and documentary evidence at the argument stage, holding that curtailing the plaintiff's right to prove their case would cause prejudice and that avoiding multiplicity of proceedings served interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2024
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jun-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Oct-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Mar-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Nov-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Aug-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2022
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Oct-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Aug-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Oct-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jun-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jul-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Apr-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Apr-2019
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Oct-2018
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2018
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2018
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2018
Cross Of Pw1
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jan-2018
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jul-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jun-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2017
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2016
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Apr-2016
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jan-2016
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Aug-2015
Issues.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2015
Issues.
-
02-Feb-2015
Hearing
-
15-Dec-2014
Hearing
-
28-Oct-2014
Hearing
-
10-Sep-2014
Hearing
-
02-Aug-2014
Hearing
-
19-Jul-2014
Hearing
-
23-Jun-2014
Hearing
-
03-Jun-2014
Hearing
-
11-Mar-2014
Hearing
-
07-Jan-2014
Hearing
-
07-Aug-2013
Hearing
-
02-Jul-2013
Hearing
-
19-Jun-2013
Hearing
-
24-Apr-2013
Hearing
-
25-Mar-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
—
Case filed
Registration No. 303/2012
Case Summary: 303/2012 - YESU DASU W v. A. SUDHAKAR REDDY AND ANOTHER Outcome: The court allowed all three interim applications (I.A. III, IV, and V) filed by the plaintiff seeking permission to lead further chief examination and produce additional documents in a permanent injunction suit. I.A. III and IV were allowed with costs of Rs. 500 each; I.A. V was allowed unconditionally. The court found sufficient grounds permitting the plaintiff to adduce further oral and documentary evidence at the argument stage, holding that curtailing the plaintiff's right to prove their case would cause prejudice and that avoiding multiplicity of proceedings served interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts