BYREGOWDA vs THE TAHASILDAR, DEVANAHALLI — 5/2026

Case under Order 13 3 of Birth and Death Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABR320000062026

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI

Judge

1079-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 13 3 of Birth and Death Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BYREGOWDA

    Adv. K.H.RAMANJANEYA

  2. 2.ESHWARAMMA

  3. 3.SARASWATHAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASILDAR, DEVANAHALLI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The petitioners sought to register the death of their father, Munishamappa, who died on 25-08-1980 but whose death was never registered with the Tahasildar's office. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible—supported by affidavit testimony, notarized family tree, Aadhar cards, and newspaper publications—and directed the Tahasildar to enter the death date in the official register and issue a certified death certificate, enabling the petitioners to change property ownership records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Call On

    II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The petitioners sought to register the death of their father, Munishamappa, who died on 25-08-1980 but whose death was never registered with the Tahasildar's office. The court found the petitioners' evidence credible—supported by affidavit testimony, notarized family tree, Aadhar cards, and newspaper publications—and directed the Tahasildar to enter the death date in the official register and issue a certified death certificate, enabling the petitioners to change property ownership records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case