Pattada Sri Gurunneshwara Shivachary swamigalu vs Ashwathamma — 1190/2024

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Disposed: Contested--PLAINT REJECTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR310016452024

Filing Number

1211/2024

Filing Date

23-Nov-2024

Registration No

1190/2024

Registration Date

23-Nov-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI

Judge

849-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PLAINT REJECTED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pattada Sri Gurunneshwara Shivachary swamigalu

    Adv. J S Dinesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashwathamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 1190/2024 Court Decision: The plaint was rejected and the suit dismissed as barred by law. Key Reasoning: The court held that the plaintiff's suit—seeking a declaration of title and cancellation of a 2024 sale deed—indirectly challenged a 1980 Land Tribunal order granting occupancy rights to the defendants' predecessor. Under Sections 132 and 133 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, civil courts lack jurisdiction to question Land Tribunal orders. The court found the plaintiff failed to make revenue officials (allegedly involved in creating the Land Tribunal order) parties to the suit, further barring the claim under established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 03-Feb-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 04-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 05-Nov-2025

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 03-Nov-2025

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 11-Sep-2025

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 02-Aug-2025

    Hearing On IA

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 04-Jul-2025

    Objections

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 17-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 17-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 25-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 23-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1190/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 1190/2024 Court Decision: The plaint was rejected and the suit dismissed as barred by law. Key Reasoning: The court held that the plaintiff's suit—seeking a declaration of title and cancellation of a 2024 sale deed—indirectly challenged a 1980 Land Tribunal order granting occupancy rights to the defendants' predecessor. Under Sections 132 and 133 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, civil courts lack jurisdiction to question Land Tribunal orders. The court found the plaintiff failed to make revenue officials (allegedly involved in creating the Land Tribunal order) parties to the suit, further barring the claim under established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case