Narayanaswamy vs M. Muniyappa — 1007/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR310013002023
Filing Number
1026/2023
Filing Date
23-Sep-2023
Registration No
1007/2023
Registration Date
23-Sep-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
1062-I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Narayanaswamy
Adv. Ashwinkumar B.M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. Muniyappa
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 1007/2023 Court Decision: The suit for partition was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court declared that the 2009 sale deed executed without the plaintiffs' consent is not binding on their ancestral property share, and held that the plaintiffs are collectively entitled to one-half share in the suit property as members of an undivided Hindu joint family. Key Reasoning: The court found the property to be ancestral (inherited through Muniyappa), established that no prior partition occurred among family members, and determined that the 2009 sale deed—executed after the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 cutoff date—was invalid without proof of family necessity or bona fide purchase by the buyer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Apr-2026
Judgment
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
ExhibitsView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
ExhibitsView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Aug-2025
Paper Publication
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Aug-2025
Steps
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jun-2025
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2025
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2024
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Nov-2024
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2024
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Jul-2024
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Apr-2024
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Feb-2024
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2023
Reissue Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Nov-2023
Await Suit Summons
I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1007/2023
Case Summary: O.S. No. 1007/2023 Court Decision: The suit for partition was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court declared that the 2009 sale deed executed without the plaintiffs' consent is not binding on their ancestral property share, and held that the plaintiffs are collectively entitled to one-half share in the suit property as members of an undivided Hindu joint family. Key Reasoning: The court found the property to be ancestral (inherited through Muniyappa), established that no prior partition occurred among family members, and determined that the 2009 sale deed—executed after the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 cutoff date—was invalid without proof of family necessity or bona fide purchase by the buyer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts