H.R. Natraj vs Chikka Akkayamma — 681/2024
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Notice. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR310009682024
Filing Number
693/2024
Filing Date
11-Jul-2024
Registration No
681/2024
Registration Date
11-Jul-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
849-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.H.R. Natraj
Adv. Mohammed Sadeer Ahmed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chikka Akkayamma
-
2.Muniyappa
-
3.Baby Amrutha
-
4.Baby Abhinaya
-
5.Master Shivaraj
-
6.The Special DC (KIADB)
-
7.Special Land Acquisition Officer-2
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2026
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jun-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Dec-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jul-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 681/2024 H.R. Natraj filed a specific performance suit against defendants who agreed to sell him land for Rs. 68 lakhs but failed to deliver after he paid Rs. 24.18 lakhs advance. The land was subsequently acquired by government authorities (defendants 6 & 7). The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining defendants 6 & 7 from releasing compensation to defendants 1-5, and dispensed with statutory notice requirement. The case is returnable by September 10, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 681/2024
Case Summary: O.S. No. 681/2024 H.R. Natraj filed a specific performance suit against defendants who agreed to sell him land for Rs. 68 lakhs but failed to deliver after he paid Rs. 24.18 lakhs advance. The land was subsequently acquired by government authorities (defendants 6 & 7). The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining defendants 6 & 7 from releasing compensation to defendants 1-5, and dispensed with statutory notice requirement. The case is returnable by September 10, 2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts