Somanna.A vs C.Narayanaswamy — 228/2020
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 151. Disposed: Contested--PLAINT REJECTED on 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR310002852020
Filing Number
236/2020
Filing Date
28-Feb-2020
Registration No
228/2020
Registration Date
02-Mar-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI
Judge
849-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PLAINT REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Somanna.A
Adv. K.Mohan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.C.Narayanaswamy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Somanna.A v. C. Narayanaswamy (O.S. No. 228/2020) The court rejected the plaintiff's plaint, finding it barred by limitation and lacking a genuine cause of action. The plaintiff claimed ownership of agricultural land based on a 1957 sale deed to his grandfather but filed suit 63 years later, after the defendant's family had partitioned and registered the property in their names via a 1973 deed. The court held that the plaintiff's predecessors never acted on the original sale deed or challenged the 1973 partition, thereby losing their rights through delay and acquiescence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing On IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing On IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2026
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2026
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Oct-2024
Exhibits
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2024
Exhibits
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-May-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jan-2024
Orders
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Dec-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Nov-2023
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Sep-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2023
Issue
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Mar-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Nov-2022
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Sep-2022
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2022
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-May-2022
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jan-2022
Await Suit Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Dec-2021
Await Suit Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Oct-2021
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Aug-2021
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2021
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2021
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Sep-2020
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2020
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 228/2020
Case Summary: Somanna.A v. C. Narayanaswamy (O.S. No. 228/2020) The court rejected the plaintiff's plaint, finding it barred by limitation and lacking a genuine cause of action. The plaintiff claimed ownership of agricultural land based on a 1957 sale deed to his grandfather but filed suit 63 years later, after the defendant's family had partitioned and registered the property in their names via a 1973 deed. The court held that the plaintiff's predecessors never acted on the original sale deed or challenged the 1973 partition, thereby losing their rights through delay and acquiescence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts