Allah Bakash vs Mehaboob — 2/2026

Case under U/o. 43 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KABR310001162026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI

Judge

1062-I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o. 43 Rule 1 of C.p.c

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Allah Bakash

    Adv. A R Srinivas Reddy

  2. 2.Muneer

  3. 3.Malan

  4. 4.Shaheena

  5. 5.Baba Jan

  6. 6.Khaleel

  7. 7.Ismail

  8. 8.Rafiq

  9. 9.Kallq

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mehaboob

  2. 2.Munni

  3. 3.Fakrudin

  4. 4.Amer Jan

  5. 5.Shashasad B

  6. 6.Rahamathunissa

  7. 7.Zameena Bi

  8. 8.Jubeda

  9. 9.Mahabeeb Jan

  10. 10.Safoora

  11. 11.Ameer Jan

  12. 12.Gulab Jan

  13. 13.Mubeena

  14. 14.Yarab

  15. 15.Tahasina

  16. 16.Tahasina

  17. 17.Mubarrak

  18. 18.Simran

  19. 19.Sheik Pyare Jan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY The appellate court (I Addl Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Devanahalli) reversed the trial court's temporary injunction order restraining defendants from construction on disputed property. The appellants (defendants below) challenged the December 2025 injunction granted to plaintiffs in a partition suit filed in 2009 over agricultural land. The court found no prima facie case favoring plaintiffs, who claimed ownership based on their deceased father's 1961 purchase but the property had been sold in 1973 and 1977 with defendants now in possession for 48+ years. The injunction was set aside, allowing construction to proceed subject to the ultimate trial outcome and defendants' undertaking not to alienate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Judgment

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Objections

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 24-Jan-2026

    Notice

    I Addl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The appellate court (I Addl Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Devanahalli) reversed the trial court's temporary injunction order restraining defendants from construction on disputed property. The appellants (defendants below) challenged the December 2025 injunction granted to plaintiffs in a partition suit filed in 2009 over agricultural land. The court found no prima facie case favoring plaintiffs, who claimed ownership based on their deceased father's 1961 purchase but the property had been sold in 1973 and 1977 with defendants now in possession for 48+ years. The injunction was set aside, allowing construction to proceed subject to the ultimate trial outcome and defendants' undertaking not to alienate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case