Gowramma vs Srinivas — 777/2024
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR220104602024
Filing Number
768/2024
Filing Date
19-Oct-2024
Registration No
777/2024
Registration Date
22-Oct-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
95-Prl. CIVIL Judge
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gowramma
Adv. Shivakumar R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Srinivas
-
2.The Chief Officer TMC Anekal
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Reissue Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Dec-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS No. 777/2024 (Gowramma v. Srinivas) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application for temporary injunction on December 20, 2024. While finding a prima-facie case for trial, the court ruled that the balance of convenience favors the defendant and no irreparable injury would result from denying the injunction, as the defendant has already substantially completed a three-story building on his property and only finishing work remains. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Dec-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 777/2024
Case Summary: OS No. 777/2024 (Gowramma v. Srinivas) Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application for temporary injunction on December 20, 2024. While finding a prima-facie case for trial, the court ruled that the balance of convenience favors the defendant and no irreparable injury would result from denying the injunction, as the defendant has already substantially completed a three-story building on his property and only finishing work remains. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts