Indresh vs The Tahasildar — 530/2026
Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 14th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION
CNR: KABR220041672026
Filing Number
554/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
530/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
95-Prl. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Indresh
Adv. Hemanthakumar G
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahasildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 530/2026 Summary: The court allowed Indresh's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of his mother, Ammayyamma (wife of Late Krishnappa), who died on 20-03-1991 in Avalahalli village, and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's evidence—including genealogical records, Aadhar card, and newspaper publication—sufficiently established the death details, and the certificate was necessary for property transfer to the petitioner's name. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 530/2026
Case 530/2026 Summary: The court allowed Indresh's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of his mother, Ammayyamma (wife of Late Krishnappa), who died on 20-03-1991 in Avalahalli village, and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioner's evidence—including genealogical records, Aadhar card, and newspaper publication—sufficiently established the death details, and the certificate was necessary for property transfer to the petitioner's name. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts