D Thimmarayappa vs The Chief Officer — 533/2026
Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION
CNR: KABR220041432026
Filing Number
542/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
533/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
95-Prl. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D Thimmarayappa
Adv. V JAVAREGOWDA
-
2.D Narayanappa
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chief Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 533/2026 Summary The court allowed the petition filed by D Thimmarayappa and D Narayanappa under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Chief Officer, Anekal Town, to register and issue a death certificate for their mother Kempamma (W/o Late Dodda Doddaiah), who died on 11-09-2002. The court found the petitioners' claim substantiated through oral testimony, genealogical records, Aadhaar documentation, and newspaper publication, with the respondent offering no contrary evidence despite being treated ex-parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 533/2026
Case 533/2026 Summary The court allowed the petition filed by D Thimmarayappa and D Narayanappa under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Chief Officer, Anekal Town, to register and issue a death certificate for their mother Kempamma (W/o Late Dodda Doddaiah), who died on 11-09-2002. The court found the petitioners' claim substantiated through oral testimony, genealogical records, Aadhaar documentation, and newspaper publication, with the respondent offering no contrary evidence despite being treated ex-parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts