Ramadevi.M vs Nanda Kumar — 752/2013
Case under 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section 0. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR220035102013
Filing Number
752/2013
Filing Date
21-Dec-2013
Registration No
752/2013
Registration Date
21-Dec-2013
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
95-Prl. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramadevi.M
Adv. K. Subba Raju Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nanda Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Orders
The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC at Anekal dismissed the suit filed by Ramadevi.M against Nanda Kumar for non-prosecution. The court permitted the plaintiff's counsel to retire after accepting justified reasons in the retirement memo, and subsequently dismissed the case when the plaintiff failed to appear despite proper notice, indicating lack of interest in presenting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Orders
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Feb-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Jan-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Sep-2024
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Jul-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
30-May-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
01-Feb-2024
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Nov-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Sep-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Aug-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
01-Jun-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
15-Mar-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
15-Feb-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Jan-2023
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Nov-2022
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Sep-2022
Call On
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
11-Aug-2022
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
06-Jun-2022
Hear further
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Feb-2022
Hear further
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Nov-2021
Hear further
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Oct-2021
Hear further
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Sep-2021
Hear further
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Aug-2021
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Aug-2021
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Jun-2021
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
25-May-2021
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Mar-2021
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Feb-2021
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
01-Feb-2021
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Dec-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Nov-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
21-Sep-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Aug-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Aug-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
06-Jul-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Jun-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
05-May-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Apr-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
02-Mar-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
21-Jan-2020
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Dec-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Oct-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Sep-2019
Lok adalath
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Sep-2019
Lok adalath
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
07-Aug-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Jul-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jun-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
15-Apr-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Mar-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2019
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Nov-2018
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Oct-2018
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Aug-2018
Hear
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Jun-2018
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Mar-2018
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
31-May-2017
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2016
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Aug-2015
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge
-
28-Oct-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 752/2013
The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC at Anekal dismissed the suit filed by Ramadevi.M against Nanda Kumar for non-prosecution. The court permitted the plaintiff's counsel to retire after accepting justified reasons in the retirement memo, and subsequently dismissed the case when the plaintiff failed to appear despite proper notice, indicating lack of interest in presenting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts