A Thimma Reddy vs Srinivasaiah — 127/2026

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR220008082026

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL

Judge

95-Prl. CIVIL Judge

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A Thimma Reddy

    Adv. M Jagannatah Thorath

  2. 2.Lalithamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Srinivasaiah

  2. 2.Srinivasiah

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer

  4. 4.The Panchayath Development officer

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Objections

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Call On

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 127/2026 Outcome: The interim application (IA No.II) for temporary injunction was allowed in part. The court directed both parties to maintain status quo on the disputed "Schedule B" property (an alleged public road) pending trial disposal. Key Issue: Plaintiffs sought to prevent defendant from constructing on Schedule B property, claiming it is a public road necessary for accessing their Schedule A property. The court found plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on historical sale deeds and the defendant's own representations, though the exact status requires full trial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    written statement

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Await Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  14. 11-Feb-2026

    Issue Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge

  15. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 127/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 127/2026 Outcome: The interim application (IA No.II) for temporary injunction was allowed in part. The court directed both parties to maintain status quo on the disputed "Schedule B" property (an alleged public road) pending trial disposal. Key Issue: Plaintiffs sought to prevent defendant from constructing on Schedule B property, claiming it is a public road necessary for accessing their Schedule A property. The court found plaintiffs established a prima facie case based on historical sale deeds and the defendant's own representations, though the exact status requires full trial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case