Smt. D.C. Prathima vs Sri. K.V. Sathish — 1688/2024
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR210023592024
Filing Number
1698/2024
Filing Date
18-Dec-2024
Registration No
1688/2024
Registration Date
19-Dec-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
1061-II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. D.C. Prathima
Adv. M.Jagannatha Thorath
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri. K.V. Sathish
-
2.Smt. M.V. Vishala,
-
3.Smt. Anitha Ullas
-
4.Smt.Divya Kesavan
-
5.Mr. K. Matheen Khan
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Jun-2026
ExhibitsView PDF
In Case 1688/2024, petitioner Smt. D.C. Prathima's main examination was conducted on 04.06.2026, with the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents (power of attorney, sale deed dated 06.12.2021, payment receipt, bank passbook, and bank statement) admitted as exhibits. The respondents failed to file a counter-affidavit, resulting in no contest being raised against the petitioner's claims. The case proceeded without cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Objections by
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2025
written statement
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2025
written statement
II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1688/2024
In Case 1688/2024, petitioner Smt. D.C. Prathima's main examination was conducted on 04.06.2026, with the petitioner's affidavit and supporting documents (power of attorney, sale deed dated 06.12.2021, payment receipt, bank passbook, and bank statement) admitted as exhibits. The respondents failed to file a counter-affidavit, resulting in no contest being raised against the petitioner's claims. The case proceeded without cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts