CHINNAMMA vs M. ANANDA — 901/2006
Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR210016372006
Registration No
901/2006
Registration Date
02-Jun-2006
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
891-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHINNAMMA
Adv. PGK
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. ANANDA
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Dec-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Sep-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jun-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Feb-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Sep-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jul-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Apr-2024
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Dec-2023
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jun-2023
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2023
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jun-2022
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Nov-2021
Settlement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-May-2021
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Feb-2021
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2017
Restored
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Aug-2016
OrdersView PDF
Case 901/2006 (Chinnamma v. M. Ananda) - Summary The suit between petitioner Chinnamma and respondent M. Ananda has been compromised. The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Anekal disposed of the case by accepting the compromise reached between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Aug-2016
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2016
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Apr-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
—
Case filed
Registration No. 901/2006
Case 901/2006 (Chinnamma v. M. Ananda) - Summary The suit between petitioner Chinnamma and respondent M. Ananda has been compromised. The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC at Anekal disposed of the case by accepting the compromise reached between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts