Shankarappa vs Muniyappa — 1069/2022

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 15126. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR210014682022

Filing Number

1068/2022

Filing Date

22-Sep-2022

Registration No

1069/2022

Registration Date

22-Sep-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL

Judge

891-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 15126

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shankarappa

    Adv. P. Basavaraju

  2. 2.Venkataramana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muniyappa

  2. 2.Mankalappa

  3. 3.Muni Reddy

  4. 4.Narayana Reddy

  5. 5.Jayarama Reddy

  6. 6.Thimma Reddy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary of Case 1069/2022 The court rejected the plaintiffs' partition suit on the grounds that it lacks a cause of action and is barred by law. The key issue involved ancestral joint family property that was granted to Sadappa in 1959 with a non-alienation clause, but was alienated through sales in 1960 and 1962. Although revenue authorities initially restored the property to the family, the Karnataka High Court subsequently set aside this restoration and upheld the sale deeds in 2021-2022. Since the property was no longer available to the family due to the High Court's final orders, the court found no valid basis for the plaintiffs' partition claim and rejected the plaint entirely under CPC Rule 11. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 09-Jul-2025

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 06-Mar-2025

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 10-Jan-2025

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 27-Sep-2024

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 26-Jul-2024

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 26-Jun-2024

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 25-Mar-2024

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 09-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 02-Dec-2023

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 25-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 02-Sep-2023

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 01-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 01-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 22-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1069/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1069/2022 The court rejected the plaintiffs' partition suit on the grounds that it lacks a cause of action and is barred by law. The key issue involved ancestral joint family property that was granted to Sadappa in 1959 with a non-alienation clause, but was alienated through sales in 1960 and 1962. Although revenue authorities initially restored the property to the family, the Karnataka High Court subsequently set aside this restoration and upheld the sale deeds in 2021-2022. Since the property was no longer available to the family due to the High Court's final orders, the court found no valid basis for the plaintiffs' partition claim and rejected the plaint entirely under CPC Rule 11. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case