GOVINDAPPA vs MANJUNATH — 311/2014
Case under 26 R/w Order 7 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR210005462014
Filing Number
313/2014
Filing Date
20-Mar-2014
Registration No
311/2014
Registration Date
20-Mar-2014
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
891-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVINDAPPA
Adv. C.H. ASSOCIATES
-
2.BHAGYAMMA
-
3.GANGADAR
-
4.MEENAKSHI
-
5.RAMESH
-
6.RAMESH
-
7.VENKATESH
-
8.AMARAVATHI
-
9.MUNIRATHNAMMA
-
10.MITTAYALLAMMA
-
11.SANJIVAMMA
-
12.GANGAMMA
-
13.LAKSHMAMMA
-
14.PILLAPPA
-
15.VENKATESH
-
16.ANJANAPPA
-
17.MUNIRAJU
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANJUNATH
-
2.GOVINDARAJU
-
3.GURAPPA REDDY
-
4.GOPAL REDDY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 311/2014 Decision: The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit for partition, allowing defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a) & (d). Key Reasoning: The court held that since the property was self-acquired by plaintiff No.1's mother (Nyathamma) and was sold in 1958 before the plaintiffs were even born, they have no right by birth to claim partition or challenge the 1958 sale deed. The suit was barred by limitation and lacked cause of action, as a female Hindu's self-acquired property cannot be subjected to partition by subsequent-born children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Sep-2025
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Aug-2025
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Mar-2025
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Dec-2024
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Sep-2024
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2024
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Apr-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Feb-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Oct-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jun-2021
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2021
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Nov-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Aug-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jun-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Feb-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2019
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-May-2017
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Sep-2016
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2014
Case filed
Registration No. 311/2014
Case Summary: OS No. 311/2014 Decision: The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit for partition, allowing defendants' application to dismiss the plaint under CPC Order 7 Rule 11(a) & (d). Key Reasoning: The court held that since the property was self-acquired by plaintiff No.1's mother (Nyathamma) and was sold in 1958 before the plaintiffs were even born, they have no right by birth to claim partition or challenge the 1958 sale deed. The suit was barred by limitation and lacked cause of action, as a female Hindu's self-acquired property cannot be subjected to partition by subsequent-born children. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts