RASHEKAR vs BHAGYAMMA — 588/2009

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABR210001812009

Registration No

588/2009

Registration Date

19-Sep-2009

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL

Judge

1061-II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASHEKAR

    Adv. BEN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGYAMMA

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 01-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 06-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 26-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 22-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 09-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 20-Jun-2023

    Hear On IA

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 21-Mar-2023

    Hear On IA

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 09-Feb-2023

    Hear On IA

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 18-Jan-2023

    Objections by

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 05-Dec-2022

    Objections by

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 18-Nov-2022

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 26-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 24-Aug-2022

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 03-Aug-2022

    Arguments

    II Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 05-Jul-2022

    Arguments

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 13-Jun-2022

    Arguments

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 25-Mar-2022

    Notice

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 29-Jan-2022

    Notice

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 13-Jan-2022

    Arguments

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 14-Dec-2021

    Arguments

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 03-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 21-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 20-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 09-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 22-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 12-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 27-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 21-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 01-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 28-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 10-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 13-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 31-Aug-2019

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 31-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 29-May-2018

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 588/2009 - RASHEKAR v. BHAGYAMMA The court order (dated 29-05-2018) concerns a property dispute involving agricultural land registered under Survey No. 1/1 consisting of 3 acres 26 guntas (total 9 acres). The petitioner challenged the respondent's claim over a portion of this property, with references to Original Suit 47/1975 and subsequent decree 132/1998. The petition was dismissed, with the court holding that the respondent's title and possession over the disputed property portion (3 acres 26 guntas) were legally established and upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  56. 29-May-2018

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 06-Feb-2018

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 24-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 15-Sep-2016

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 12-Aug-2016

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 15-Jul-2016

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 21-Apr-2016

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 20-Jan-2016

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 04-Feb-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. Case filed

    Registration No. 588/2009

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 588/2009 - RASHEKAR v. BHAGYAMMA The court order (dated 29-05-2018) concerns a property dispute involving agricultural land registered under Survey No. 1/1 consisting of 3 acres 26 guntas (total 9 acres). The petitioner challenged the respondent's claim over a portion of this property, with references to Original Suit 47/1975 and subsequent decree 132/1998. The petition was dismissed, with the court holding that the respondent's title and possession over the disputed property portion (3 acres 26 guntas) were legally established and upheld. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case