KUMARI PAVITHRA. A vs SRI.ARASAPPA — 1/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UNDERORDER7RULE1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABR210000082013
Filing Number
1/2013
Filing Date
02-Jan-2013
Registration No
1/2013
Registration Date
02-Jan-2013
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL
Judge
891-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUMARI PAVITHRA. A
Adv. SRI.R.RAMESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI.ARASAPPA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking partition of ancestral property, finding they lack legal standing to challenge sale deeds executed by their grandfather in May 2004, prior to the December 20, 2004 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act. Since the plaintiffs' father was a party to the alienation, the daughters cannot claim a notional share in his portion under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Amendment Act, and an earlier similar suit filed by a family member had been dismissed with finality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jan-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Jul-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jun-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jun-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Mar-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jun-2024
Objections by
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jun-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Apr-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jan-2024
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Nov-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Oct-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Apr-2023
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2021
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2021
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Feb-2021
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Aug-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2020
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Dec-2019
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Aug-2019
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Feb-2018
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Aug-2017
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2017
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2013
Steps
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jan-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2013
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2013
The court rejected the plaintiffs' suit seeking partition of ancestral property, finding they lack legal standing to challenge sale deeds executed by their grandfather in May 2004, prior to the December 20, 2004 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act. Since the plaintiffs' father was a party to the alienation, the daughters cannot claim a notional share in his portion under Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Amendment Act, and an earlier similar suit filed by a family member had been dismissed with finality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts