NELAMANGALA RURAL POLICE STATION vs A1. GIRISH N. ALIAS SADA — 276/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/S, 399, 402, OF IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABR010061802021

Filing Number

276/2021

Filing Date

09-Dec-2021

Registration No

276/2021

Registration Date

09-Dec-2021

Court

PRL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL

Judge

536-Prl.district And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

186

Police Station

NELAMANGALA RURAL PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/S, 399, 402, OF IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NELAMANGALA RURAL POLICE STATION

    Adv. A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A1. GIRISH N. ALIAS SADA

  2. 2.A2. GOVINDARAJU G. S. ALIAS GOVI

  3. 3.A3. ANUP MOHAN

  4. 4.A4. PUNITH KUMAR H. P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: S.C. No. 276/2021 Court Decision: All five accused persons (Girish N., Govindaraju G.S., Anup Mohan, Punith Kumar H.P., and Raghukumar) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 399 & 402 (dacoity-related offenses). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of independent corroboration. The two panch witnesses turned hostile and denied knowledge of the seizure proceedings, while the remaining evidence from investigating officers was merely procedural. Critically, the court held that merely possessing weapons does not establish the requisite intent to commit dacoity or gang formation—the prosecution must prove criminal intention, which remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    313 Statement

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Accused Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    Deposition

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  15. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  16. 28-Oct-2025

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  17. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  18. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  19. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  20. 02-May-2025

    Deposition

  21. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  22. 01-Apr-2025

    Cross Examination Of P.W.

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  23. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  24. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  25. 11-Feb-2025

    Call On

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  26. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  27. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  28. 06-Nov-2024

    Call On

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  29. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  30. 08-Aug-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  31. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  32. 13-Jun-2024

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  33. 15-May-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  34. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  35. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  36. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  37. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  38. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  39. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  40. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  41. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  42. 18-Nov-2023

    Deposition

  43. 18-Nov-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  44. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  45. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  46. 08-Aug-2023

    Deposition

  47. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  48. 07-Aug-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  49. 01-Jul-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  50. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  51. 28-Apr-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  52. 29-Mar-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  53. 28-Feb-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  54. 01-Feb-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  55. 09-Jan-2023

    Deposition

  56. 09-Jan-2023

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  57. 06-Dec-2022

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  58. 10-Nov-2022

    Evidnce

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  59. 01-Oct-2022

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  60. 01-Aug-2022

    Fdt

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  61. 24-Jun-2022

    Charge

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  62. 06-Jun-2022

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  63. 25-Apr-2022

    Hbc

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  64. 30-Mar-2022

    To furnish surety

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  65. 09-Mar-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  66. 08-Mar-2022

    To furnish surety

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  67. 07-Feb-2022

    Summons

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  68. 17-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Prl.district And Sessions Judge

  69. 15-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 09-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 276/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C. No. 276/2021 Court Decision: All five accused persons (Girish N., Govindaraju G.S., Anup Mohan, Punith Kumar H.P., and Raghukumar) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 399 & 402 (dacoity-related offenses). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of independent corroboration. The two panch witnesses turned hostile and denied knowledge of the seizure proceedings, while the remaining evidence from investigating officers was merely procedural. Critically, the court held that merely possessing weapons does not establish the requisite intent to commit dacoity or gang formation—the prosecution must prove criminal intention, which remained absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case